On November 22, 1995, the Homedale Planning and Zoning Commission (“Commission”) held a meeting at the building inspector's office. The building site was located in an area zoned “public.” The City of Homedale building inspector conditionally approved the zoning permit contingent upon the definition of the phrase “school, elementary-high school,” as used in the Homedale City Ordinance (“Ordinance”). In November of 1995 the School District applied for a building permit for the construction of the facility. The School District solicited and accepted a bid for the construction of the facility later that summer and selected a site for the new facility on the grounds of the Homedale High School. 370 (“School District”) met for the purpose of allocating funds for the purchase and construction of a transportation and maintenance facility (“facility”), otherwise known as a bus barn, used to store school buses and maintain equipment owned by the School District. In July of 1995 the School Board for Homedale Joint School District No. The property owner also appeals the award of attorney fees by the district court. Brady, a resident of Homedale, Idaho, who objected to the construction of a school bus maintenance and storage facility on property across the street from her house. This is an appeal of an order from the Third District Court which denied petitions for a writ of mandamus, a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Clayton Gill argued for Joint School District. White, Peterson, Pruss, Morrow and Gigray, P.A., Nampa Bowen, Brassey, Gardner, Wetherell & Crawford, Boise, for Defendants–Respondents.
Roberts & Robinson, Caldwell, for Petitioner–Appellant.
The CITY OF HOMEDALE, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Joint School District No. 370, Homedale Planning and Zoning Commission, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, and John Does I–V, Defendants–Respondents.
0 kommentar(er)
